[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec
From: |
Brand Huntsman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:39:53 -0600 |
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 21:12:17 +0200
Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> Where should they go then? In $XDG_DATA_HOME?
In $XDG_CONFIG_HOME, they are config files, in a way. $XDG_DATA_HOME
feels like it should only be for files that override static files
from /usr/share/, the user-level equivalent of /usr/local/share/.
Gtk/Gnome programs do however store a recently used list in
$XDG_DATA_HOME.
> Also, would the next step be that people will ask that nano should not
> simply read /etc/nanorc but first check whether /etc/xdg/nano/nanorc
> exists and then read that one instead?
As for /etc/xdg/, should /etc/ really only contain the xdg directory??? I can
kind of understand using ~/.config/ to clean up $HOME, but not /etc/xdg/. Wine
and at-spi2-core are the only packages on my system that installed files in
/etc/xdg/.
- [Nano-devel] Improving nano's support for the XDG base directory spec, Simon Ochsenreither, 2017/10/01
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Simon Ochsenreither, 2017/10/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Mike Scalora, 2017/10/02
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Brand Huntsman, 2017/10/03
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/04
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec,
Brand Huntsman <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Brand Huntsman, 2017/10/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Brand Huntsman, 2017/10/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Simon Ochsenreither, 2017/10/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Brand Huntsman, 2017/10/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Mike Scalora, 2017/10/12
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Simon Ochsenreither, 2017/10/15
- Re: [Nano-devel] proposal to add support for the XDG base directory spec, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/10/17