Re: [Nel] compiling nel on ppc

[Vianney Lecroart]

HI,

We assume that all linux are on x86 plateform (only because we can't test it
on other plateform) so we don't set the good value for other processor.
We should use #defined value defined by configure to know if we can optimise
some part in asm.

> ../../src/3d/ps_mesh.h:551:   instantiated from here
> ../../include/nel/misc/smart_ptr_inline.h:72: invalid use of undefined
> type `class NL3D::IShape'
> ../../src/3d/ps_mesh.h:57: forward declaration of `class NL3D::IShape'
> ../../include/nel/misc/smart_ptr_inline.h:73: invalid use of undefined
> type `class NL3D::IShape'
> ../../src/3d/ps_mesh.h:57: forward declaration of `class NL3D::IShape'

We had the same problem on x86 and we fixed it (wait the next cvs syncro
this night).

But I warn you, we never try NeL on non-x86 processor, it surely doesn't
work :) First you should fix types_nl.h and changed:

#  define NL_OS_UNIX
// *for now*, we suppose that all unix system are LITLLE_ENDIAN (because we
only test on linux/x86 system
#  define NL_LITTLE_ENDIAN
#endif

with

#  define NL_BIG_ENDIAN

But anyway, it should works but we never try little<->big endian conversion!

If you have a patch or something, don't hesistate to send it to us.

Vianney Lecroart
---
lead network programmer / nevrax.com
icq#: 6870415
homepage: http://ace.planet-d.net
www.geekcode.com: GCS/E d- s+++: a-- C+++$ UL++ P- L+++>+$ E+>- W++ N+ o? K-
w++$ O- M- V- PS- PE? Y PGP t 5? X+ R- tv++ b- DI D+ G e++ h+ r-- y?