[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior |
|
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:26:53 -0400 |
>I took rader's issue to be that the plain text he wrote to accompany the
>PDF has come out as "application/octet-stream in base64"?
Yeah, that's what I thought as well. That's what I tested and I couldn't
reproduce. If that is happening then that's a bug, of course.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/08/09