[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior
From: |
rader |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:05:16 -0500 |
> >Ah, okay ... yeah, THAT is what's happening.
Confirmed: the msg had a utf8 single quote.
> >But that seems wrong to me;
> >what should happen is what happens to other text when processed by mhbuild
> >(namely, it's encoded with q-p and marked with the right character set).
That'd be nice.
> Alright, I took a look at that code. Right now what happens is the
> attachment code splits up the message and uses the suffixes to
> determine what the content type will be ... and the body filename
> is determined by m_mktemp(). If there's no matching suffix the
> data will be read, and if it's all ASCII it will be assumed to be
> text/plain and if NOT, then it's application/octet-stream. So clearly
> Steve's issue was that his message body contained at least one non-ASCII
> character.
>
> Seems to me the right solution is to make it so you can pass in a content
> type to make_mime_composition_file_entry() that overrides the algorithm
> that chooses the MIME type, and make it so the body text is always set to
> text/plain; in that case, mhbuild will make sure the right thing happens.
> That will make sure that things work right for our international users
> as well.
Sounds like an itty-bitty job for you, Ken?
steve
--
- [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Jon Steinhart, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior,
rader <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, rader, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Ken Hornstein, 2012/08/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior, Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/08/09