[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:27:37 -0500 |
>> >As far as I know the behavior of the utmpx functions are not defined by
>> >POSIX either.
>>
>> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009696899/functions/endutxent.html
>
>And on that page utmpx is marked as an XSI extension. To my understanding
>those are optional and not required to be implemented in POSIX-compliant
>software.
The situation is more complicated than that, but that's not really my
point. They have a defined behavior; THAT is my point.
And if every OTHER Unix implements these functions, what does that
really tell you?
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Jerrad Pierce, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Jerrad Pierce, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Anthony J. Bentley, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Ken Hornstein, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Anthony J. Bentley, 2013/01/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/01/01
Re: [Nmh-workers] Garbage collection, Paul Vixie, 2013/01/01