[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues
From: |
Jerrad Pierce |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:37 -0500 |
>And, I have to ask ... 1.3? You're not the only person still using that,
>so I'm wondering if I did something wrong, or you just haven't seen a reason
>to upgrade yet.
I'm running CentOS 5.9, so no package support.
I downloaded master for mhfixmsg this past spring, one of the more compelling
features that I can think of*, but ended up just installing it alone. I meant
to get around to doing the rest, but got sidetracked before I could make the
necessary backups and tests of things.
Although checking the docs/pending-release-notes, there were some other small
features/fixes that are nice; I remember not being able to give args to rmmproc
being an annoyance, as well as rmmproc's 1k limit... but I've been trained to
just do `rmm first:998` by now ;-)
- [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, belg4mit, 2014/02/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/02/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jon Steinhart, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Robert Elz, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Bill Wohler, 2014/02/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/02/24
Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/02/24
Re: [Nmh-workers] hooks interface issues, Ken Hornstein, 2014/02/23