Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1

[norm]

Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> writes:
>>It looks like, when it finally comes out, nmh-1.6 will represent a
>>revolutionary change it the way nmh deals with MIME.
>>
>>But, in the nearly two years since nmh-1.5, there have been many other
>>important (at least important to me) improvements. For example, to sortm,
>>mhbuld, mhstore, and message sequencing, that I'm itching to get ahold of.
>>Even the Mime related stuff already there will be a big improvement.
>>
>>So I wonder if I could prevail upon somebody to create and release an
>>nmh-1.6-RC1. I can't -- way about my pay grade.
>
>I'm personally reluctant to start a release cycle since to me when you
>start a release cycle you don't add any new features and I'm in the
>middle of working on some features which I think are pretty important.
>Yes, I know that it's been a while since 1.5; Lyndon has made this point
>as well, and I feel your pain.

What if you called it mh-1.6alpha, or even mh-1.5omega ?



    Norman Shapiro