[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:33:03 -0800 |
On Feb 27, 2014, at 7:14 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> What if you called it mh-1.6alpha, or even mh-1.5omega ?
Because it isn't. Until we are actually approaching a release (i.e. in feature
freeze) this is just needless make-work for the developers. If you want a
snapshot release, all the tools for you to build one are in the source tree.
And on any form of modern hardware, going from checkout to RPM takes about two
minutes.
--lyndon
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail