[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 19:13:09 -0700 |
On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:11 PM, David Levine <address@hidden> wrote:
> We won't find standards support for it: 465 for SMTPS was
> revoked by IANA (in 1998!) and reassigned to another service.
> But as long as AT&T (I know), Verizon (I think), and whoever
> else require it, we're stuck with it.
No we're not. Nor should we support it. The standards-based alternatives are
available and should me used.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, heymanj, 2014/07/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Paul Fox, 2014/07/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Christer Boräng, 2014/07/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, heymanj, 2014/07/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/07/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/09
Re: [Nmh-workers] modernizing smtp message submission, David Levine, 2014/07/07