[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:56:46 -0500 |
>i'd prefer symbolic, but i understand that it's probably complicated to
>get right.
It's actually not hard ... you'd have a table to convert a numeric offset
to a symbolic one, with two entries (one for regular, one for DST). It's
just ... should we bother?
--Ken
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Vixie, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15