Re: [Nmh-workers] date math

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:07 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:

> In the EST/CDT division, existing routines already "know" if a
> particular date falls under DST so there is no ambiguity there.  But
> like you said, it's hard to know if the sender is in the "wrong"
> hemisphere :-)

Do they get Saskatchewan right?  (I haven't looked at the code.  I don't want 
to.)

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail