[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:15:02 -0800 |
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
>David Levine <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ken wrote:
>>
>>> >[Norm:]
>>> >Shouldn't that be the default?
>>>
>>> You know ... maybe? What do others think?
>>
>> No, because date is the sender's context. And it's easy enough
>> to change how it's viewed.
>
>Disagree, because the date is viewed in the reader's context.
>
>Easy enough? If it were easy, then why did 30 years pass before I
>found out how to do it.
What everybody seems to be saying is that whatever the default, it should be
easier to specify alternatives, whether for both show and scan.
Norman Shapiro
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, David Levine, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Jerrad Pierce, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Eric Gillespie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Bill Wohler, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
norm <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Fox, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15