[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:23:53 -0500 |
Lyndon writes:
> I would urge you to re-read Robert Elz's comments, and spend a
> day contemplating the consequences of this change. He did a
> much better job explaining the concerns I have about this.
Agreed.
We also haven't heard from Jon Steinhart.
David
--
https://email-quarantine.google.com/messagecenter
--
https://email-quarantine.google.com/messagecenter
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Paul Vixie, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Robert Elz, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Bill Wohler, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, David Levine, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/16