Re: [Nmh-workers] date math

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:23 PM, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:

> Note that I was only suggesting that the timezone be displayed at the
> local side, and although I didn't mention it I was only going to suggest
> it support IETF-sanctioned timezones.  But it seems like there's little
> political will for that.

I get that.  But where things get trippy is when the sender includes a TZ name 
you don't recognize, with no accompanying ±nnnn offset info.  Yes, this 
violates 822, but I have a lot of mail in my archives with 'BST' in the <zone> 
part of the Date header, rather than a ±nnnn token.

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail