Re: [Nmh-workers] overriding multipart/alternative ordering

[Ken Hornstein]

>i think this fills a long-empty hole in the MH interface.  the only
>wart, i think, is that it depends on reordering the parts in a
>user-visible way, which perhaps violates the principle of least
>astonishment.  but it's a very clean code change, which i don't think
>would be true if trying to do something similar later on in
>mhshowsbr.c.

It seems fine to me.  I was planning on rototilling that completely as
part of the "new MIME" architecture (see previous emails), but people
will note that hasn't happened yet.  I'd rather not hold up good work
on something that I won't have time to do for a few months (at least).

--Ken