Re: [Nmh-workers] semantics of mhshow -type and -part

[Paul Fox]

i wrote:
 > i've implemented what i think is the right behavior for -part and -type.
 > the only real change (i think) from past behavior (besides the bug
 > fix that i set out to take care of) is that if you specify a part
 > with -part, it will definitely selected to appear in the output.
 > as in the current codebase, -type switches apply to parts already
 > selected with -part (or all parts, in the absence of -part) -- i.e.,
 > they act as a further filter.  specifying a multipart/alternative

i've just pushed these changes.

paul
=----------------------
 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 30.4 degrees)