Re: [Nmh-workers] forw

[Ken Hornstein]

>This message is not a complaint, a request, or even a suggestion. It just
>represents my wanting to understand the design of forw better. It seems to me
>that there ought to be an option, indeed the default, for the new
>message to contain all the attachments in the forward messages. When I forw
>messages, is it not my intent that the receiver of the new message should
>receive all the information in the forwarded messages? How am I wrong?

Are you saying it doesn't?  Because when I use forw it sure includes the
complete message, including attachments.

(It may be that you want to use forw -mime).

--Ken