Re: [Nmh-workers] forw

[Paul Vixie]

address@hidden wrote:
> I don't know what I "want". Nor will I until I understand better.
> But what I would have thought -- indeed  once did think -- that the
> default for forw, would be that all the attachments to all the messages
> being forwarded would be attachments to the new message, possibly weeding
> out duplicates (same mine type, content and where available, name).

i remember having the same expectation.

--
P Vixie