[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 09:19:01 -0400 |
Okay, hopefully we've beaten this whole thing into the ground, and after
all that here's what I suggest we do for 1.7:
1) forw be changed so -mime is the default. So if you, for example, still
want to send a RFC 934 digest, you'd have to use -nomime.
2) Doing forw -mime will result in the following header being placed in
the draft (just an example, you get the idea):
Forward: +inbox 8 22 38
Smart people will notice this looks a lot like the #forw mhbuild
directive. This is not a coincidence :-)
3) mhbuild will process any "Forward" headers at send(1) time and put
them as message/rfc822 parts at the end of the message. mhbuild will
still handle #forw directives in case someone wants to have exact control
over their message content.
4) After 1.7 comes out, Jon Steinhart will send a message to nmh-workers
asking why forw doesn't work anymore :-) (I'm sorry, I couldn't resist).
Thoughts? I realize this is a significant behavior change, and while I
do poke fun at Jon occasionally he does bring up the fair point that
breaking things is unfriendly. AFAICT nothing will break (everything will
still work) but users will definitely notice a difference.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10