Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

[Ken Hornstein]

>Because the sooner we create the prefix, the sooner future new headers
>can fall under it.  Ken says we discussed this over `Attach'.  Here we
>are for `Forward'.  Next year it will be another one?

I am going on prior art here; specifically, Fcc.  I don't see the value
in adding an Nmh- prefix to any Nmh-specific header.  I realize this is
something that there is not universal agreement on.

--Ken