[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:21:31 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
> adding the "Nmh-" prefix would create the very first such header. as
> i understand it, we already have 4 nmh-specific headers: Resent,
> Forwarded, Replied,
Those are all added only if -anno is used for each of those commands.
They don't appear in a draft?
> and Attach. i don't see much value in creating a unique prefix for
> the fifth.
Because the sooner we create the prefix, the sooner future new headers
can fall under it. Ken says we discussed this over `Attach'. Here we
are for `Forward'. Next year it will be another one?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/13