[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:40:30 -0400 |
>> I think, given current nmh design, this isn't an issue if you _forward_
>> an email (because the headers that you forward are not interpreted by
>> mhbuild). Nor is it an issue if you use "dist", since mhbuild isn't run
>> on the message you are redistributing. Although it does occur to me
>> that if you were to put an "Attach" header in the dist draft file,
>> something unexpected would happen; we should fix that.
>
>Does the calculus change if 'forw -mime' becomes the default?
Nope.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Robert Elz, 2016/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), bergman, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), norm, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10