[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:32:33 -0400 |
>thinking about this further, i think i might rather teach Attach about
>mh message numbers and sequences than add a new Forward header.
>Attach is already examining its file arguments to decide how to a
>attach any given file -- teaching it recognize message specifiers
>isn't a big stretch. this would clearly lead to these two
>invocations having different results:
Two problems I see:
"Attach" means, "attach this file with a disposition of 'attachment'".
It takes one argument: filename. The #forw directive (which I am
planning on emulating) takes a folder name and message numbers; it does
not create a disposition, so it defaults to "inline". This means different
semantics for Attach depending on the file type; I think that's bad.
It's more code.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ralph Corderoy, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), bergman, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1),
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Paul Fox, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Ken Hornstein, 2016/10/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), David Levine, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), norm, 2016/10/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/10/10