Re: [Nmh-workers] Unexpected munging of outgoing message with nmh 1.6

[Tom Lane]

Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> writes:
>> In a different line of thinking: if mhbuild did take #define as a
>> directive, why didn't it barf on an unrecognized directive?

> What version of nmh is this that doesn't barf in the night?

1.6.

Although now that I see David's mail, I think maybe it did
have -nodirectives active but the backslash removal happened anyway.

                        regards, tom lane