[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:36:49 -0500 |
>I agree nmh ships thinking %4 is big enough for anybody. That's fine.
>Your folders don't have any messages numbers that need more than four
>digits so why do you notice this bug?
Because I use scan.size (I said that already, right?), which has
%5(size), and I get a number of messages that are larger than 99999 bytes.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, David Levine, 2017/11/21
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/22