[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:42:43 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> Looking at the previous version of cpnumber() (the offending function)
> it seems the issue was when the '?' marking truncation was inserted,
> it simply REPLACED the last character inserted, but now it's just
> appended to the string.
>
> This seems like easy enough to fix
I had a look at a simple fix, but charstring_t doesn't have a popchar(),
and altering the loop by one to stop it early didn't look obvious whilst
reading in, so I rewrote the function. :-} On the plus side, no
temporary charstring_t is required, with its malloc, and the result
isn't reversed at the end. Plus, a negative width switches
justification, just like with strings. I've updated mh-format(5) a bit,
but that whole section was and still is a bit unclear and a tangle.
a034d7e5 pushed to master. That still leaves the option of a quick-fix
to 1.7, or cherry-picking this.
A slight whoopsy in trying to `git push origin a034d7e5...:master'. I
tried a --dry-run with `master:a034d7e5...' and it didn't complain so
did it for real. Unfortunately, it appears to have created a new branch
called, yep, `a034d7e5...'. And well as polluting the public repo, it
makes local git unhappy because a 40-long hex-string is ambiguous. How
does that get fixed?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, Ken Hornstein, 2017/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output, David Levine, 2017/11/21
Re: [Nmh-workers] Bug in 1.7 mh-format numeric output,
Ralph Corderoy <=