[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!
From: |
Dave O'Toole |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!! |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2000 12:37:55 -0400 |
> You're right. I totally forgot about that, since I was preoccupied
> with quality. That, and you can't get a very full range of notes with
> quality that way (I think the limit is something like 200%, or one
> octave).
Yeah. Well, even just resampling will start to sound a little funny if
you go up much more than an octave (while down is usually fine if you're
using a good resampler, i.e. not linear) Luckily most melodies don't
span more than two octaves. Hmm, I think there might be an exception or
two.... anybody a big fan of that Autechre song "NUANE"?
I think an ultra-high-quality pitchshifter could be implemented though;
it just would probably not be realtime, i.e. for use with a sample
editor that uses OCTAL plugins. And a relatively lo-fi one like the one
for Buzz would be good as a realtime toy; if it can be sufficiently
declicked it would be an essential tool.
--
@@@ david o'toole
@@@ address@hidden
@@@ www.gnu.org/software/octal
- [Octal-dev] literate programming / patterns.... let's document our work, (continued)
- [Octal-dev] literate programming / patterns.... let's document our work, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] literate programming / patterns.... let's document our work, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/14
- [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, address@hidden, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!,
Dave O'Toole <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Daniel, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Edward Coffey, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Davíð B Fanzson, 2000/05/17
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Unkargherth, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, joost diepenmaat, 2000/05/17