[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!
From: |
Steve Mosher |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!! |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2000 17:41:55 -0300 |
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Daniel wrote:
> i also have a theory, but about the
> "opposite" transformation: time
> stretching/compression *without*
> pitch-shifting. perhaps similar
> solutions apply? does anyone know what
> the state-of-the-art algorithm is for
> non-pitch-shifting time dilation?
Well, Fourier Transforms will do it for you. I read the theory
behind it today. An analogy would be making a vector image; it's more of a
formula than 'data'. This can be used to do both, if you can do one, you
can do the other, by applying one, and then changing the rate.
Read
http://www.dspdimension.com/html/dftapied.html
if you want to understand how it works. I hope this site
grows, it rocks.
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, (continued)
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, address@hidden, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Daniel, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!,
Steve Mosher <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Edward Coffey, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Davíð B Fanzson, 2000/05/17
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Unkargherth, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, joost diepenmaat, 2000/05/17
- OT: Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Matt Stanton, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, David O'Toole, 2000/05/17