[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #35157] Naive users baffled by "complex scalar type invalid as index value"

[Rik]

Follow-up Comment #17, bug #35157 (project octave):

The proposed patch looks good.  What about adding a test for the new behavior
to test_index-wfi-f.m?


%!shared x
%! x = 1:5;
%!error <attempted to use a complex scalar as an index> x(i)
%!error <attempted to use a complex scalar as an index> x(j)
%!error <attempted to use a complex scalar as an index> x(1+i)




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?35157>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/