octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: m file cache


From: Søren Hauberg
Subject: Re: m file cache
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 16:28:21 +0200

lor, 27 05 2006 kl. 14:45 +0200, skrev David Bateman:
> Seems to be a bug. Removing the inlude of fn-cache.h from help.cc and
> the compile proceeds correctly. I ran "make check" and it appears to run
> correctly, so as a quick test things seem fine..
Thanks! I really should have thought of that my self, sorry.
Things compile now, but they don't link:

g++  -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-fp -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -g -O2
-rdynamic \
        -L..  -fPIC  -o octave \
        main.o  \
        -L../liboctave -L../libcruft -L../src -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/home/sh/Programmer/lib/octave-2.9.5+ \
        -loctinterp -loctave  -lcruft    \
         -lumfpack -lamd  \
           -llapack -lblas \
        -lfftw3 -lreadline  -lncurses -ldl -lhdf5 -lz -lm
-L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/3.4.6
-L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../lib
-L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../.. -L/lib/../lib
-L/usr/lib/../lib -lhdf5 -lz -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to
`switch_to_buffer(yy_buffer_state*)'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `lexer_flags'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to
`is_keyword(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>,
std::allocator<char> > const&)'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `octave_lex()'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `reset_parser()'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to
`delete_input_buffer(void*)'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `parser_end_of_input'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `current_buffer()'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to
`create_buffer(_IO_FILE*)'
../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to
`restore_input_buffer(void*)'
collect2: ld returnerede afslutningskoden 1

Any thoughts?

Thanks, 
Soren



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]