[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
image limits
From: |
Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: |
image limits |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:55:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020 |
Here's something for you to think about. I don't think there is any rush to
resolve this, as gnuplot may tweak behavior on images slightly (hence labeled
experimental in gnuplot's configuration). But, if one tries (in CVS) image,
the outermost pixels are fractionally displayed by the automatic choice of
limits. To exaggerate, try
image([4 5 6; 7 8 9; 0 1 2])
The array is 3x3 and the limits are chosen as [1:3], which only covers the
length of two pixels.
Like I say, gnuplot may be adjusted if there is a discussion about any accepted
conventions in the graphics community (i.e., start image at zero, etc.).
Dan
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, (continued)
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- image limits,
Daniel J Sebald <=
- image limits, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/09
- Re: image limits, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/09
- Re: handle graphics (was Re: 2.9.10, finally?), Shai Ayal, 2007/02/08
- acscd.m failing, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, David Bateman, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: acscd.m failing, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/02/08
- Re: 2.9.10, finally?, John W. Eaton, 2007/02/07