AW: Re: Rewritten version of bar.m

[address@hidden]

>----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----
>Von: address@hidden
>Datum: 18.04.2007 05:56
>An: <address@hidden>
>Kopie: "octave maintainers mailing list"<address@hidden>
>Betreff: Re: Rewritten version of bar.m
>
>On 4/18/07, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Shai Ayal wrote:
>> > I'm sorry I don't have time to help right now, but have you 
looked at
>> > the bar/barh functions from octplot? They use patch objects.
>> >
>> > http://svn.sourceforge.
net/viewvc/octplot/trunk/octplot/high_level/__bar.m?
revision=432&view=markup
>> >
>> >
>> > Shai
>> >
>>
>> Shai,
>>
>> Does it really need to be that complex? In any case in the core 
we don't
>> have patches yet, so this is a stopgap till someone adds 
patches
>> (probably after 3.0).

This code isn't optimized yet. But the complexity will be not 
(strong) reduced even if the
code will be optimized. 
The bar/barh arguments can be (almost) in any order and it will 
work!
BTW, matlabs code is much more complex without to know why ...

I can't help currently a lot because my wife has born a second son 
and so we have a lot to do :-)

Michael


>I'm afraid in this case I am just the referrer. octplot's
>bar/barh/__bar__ were written by Michael Schmidt. Maybe if he is
>reading this he can help
>
>Shai
>