Re: improved matrix_type check

[dbateman]

Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote:
> 
> But you can say the same for dense matrices. I don't see why
> stretching your memory to its limits should be more common with sparse
> matrices.
> 

Ok given it depends on the person and their problem. But if that's the case
single precision sparse matrices are as useful as full ones.



> Another concern may be speed - especially if it's memory traffic that
> slows the computations down.
> 

True, but the same is true for full matrices as well. Ok I give up single
precision full matrices are as useful as single precision sparse matrices
:-)

Cheers
David

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/improved-matrix_type-check-tp17371327p17413058.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.