[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes
From: |
Rafael Laboissiere |
Subject: |
Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:24:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* David Bateman <address@hidden> [2008-07-27 01:50]:
> Although not attached here, due to its size, you can get the changeset
> that removes these toolboxes from http://hg.dbateman.org/octave where it
> is changeset number 8351.
>
> [snip]
I am just curious: will this become a common practice in the development of
Octave, I mean, removing parts of it and maintaining them as separate
packages? I think that this is a good idea, in general, and would suggest
that the code dependent on libglpk and libqhull also become separate
packages. This would reduce the list of necessary dependencies for the
Octave core package.
--
Rafael
- Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, David Bateman, 2008/07/26
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes,
Rafael Laboissiere <=
- Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, David Bateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, David Bateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Søren Hauberg, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, dbateman, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/29
- Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/29