[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ellipse
From: |
Kai Habel |
Subject: |
Re: ellipse |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:51:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
John W. Eaton schrieb:
> On 31-Jan-2009, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
> | Ok. How about
> |
> | ellipse (a, shift, level, n, ...)
> |
> | ? I guess that orders the input arguments by how important they are.
>
> I think the relative order is subjective. So I don't really see a
> good reason for changing from the original ordering.
>
> If you want to allow them in any order, then I think the best thing is
> to also accept keyword/value pairs for them in addition to the plot
> properties. But I'm not sure that it is worth the trouble.
>
> Another option is to keep them in the original ordering but allow an
> empty matrix to be used as a placeholder that means "use the default
> value". Then you could write
>
> ellipse (a, [], [], shift);
>
> is that an acceptable compromise?
>
> jwe
>
Sorry for being late to this discussion. Just for you information, I
want to make sure that you are aware of the matlab function rectangle.
It can plot rectangles, circles, and ellipses in 2D [1].
Kai
http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/techdoc/ref/rectangle.html
- ellipse, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: ellipse, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/30
- Re: ellipse, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/30
- Re: ellipse, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse,
Kai Habel <=
- Re: ellipse, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, Kai Habel, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/31
- Re: ellipse, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/01/31