Re: IPC Functions

[William Demchick]

I would agree.  It seems like an out-of-date or incomplete PROJECTS is
worse than no PROJECTS at all.

William Demchick

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2010/8/23 Judd Storrs <address@hidden>:
>> 2010/8/23 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Same as everything else, really. Are you going to be the one to
>>> maintain them? Are they currently in a good enough state to be in core
>>> Octave? Are there any licensing issues we need to take into
>>> consideration?
>>
>> If octave doesn't want them in the core, they shouldn't be listed in the
>> PROJECTS file so that well-meaning people looking for some way to contribute
>> aren't immediately set upon by this snotty, bellicose attitude.
>>
>> --judd
>>
>
> Apparently nobody is really interested in maintaining PROJECTS. I
> suggest replacing this file by a reference to the mailing list.
> Opinions?
>
> --
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek, PhD
> computing expert & GNU Octave developer
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
>
>