Re: [Patch, Profiler] First hierarchical data

[Daniel Kraft]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/15/11 05:04, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 2011/8/12 Daniel Kraft <address@hidden>:
> 
>> Here are two very small patches:
>> 
>> macros.diff just changes the profiler invokations to use macros,
>> as suggested by jwe elsewhere. This seems also like a nice change
>> to me, since we could in the future easily change the macros; for 
>> instance, to use a different profiler or whatever we like.
>> Besides, I think the user-code now looks nicer.
>> 
>> hierarchical.diff is a tiny patch that just adds return of the 
>> hierarchical data to profile('info').  This way, the user has a 
>> first "official" way to get to it.
> 
> I've pushed them, this time without modification:
> 
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/paper-graph/

Thanks!

> As far as preparing the delivery for Google, I think the attached
> will suffice as far as code we should show. It's just all of the
> patches you submitted together with your commit messages.

Yes, that's nice -- thanks for putting the stuff together!  AFAIK, the
code submission for Google is really just to make their lawyers happy;
the main use of the code is that it's included in Octave, anyway.

So in the past they accepted pretty much anything, from .diff files to
ZIP-archives of files.  Thus, your combined patch is surely all we need.

> I think the next immediate goal should be documentation. Spend a day
> or two writing a short little tutorial on how to do so. Look at the
> .txi files under doc/interpreter for examples on how to write the 
> manual chapter. Once that is done, work on the interface for seeing 
> the hierarchical data, but please don't neglect the documentation!

Ok, then I'll work on the documentation next.  Tomorrow I'm still busy
with my exam, but Wednesday to Friday I should have time to do so.
Where should I place the profiler tutorial in the manual?  Do you have a
suggestion?  But I guess once I've written it as Texinfo chapter, it
should be easy to place anywhere we decide upon.

Yours,
Daniel

- -- 
OpenPGP: 3BA2 3DDB 7758 F010 BDAB 0DCF 527E 79BA A3B5 3998
or use https://safesend.domob.eu/
- --
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Mon-Pri
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=1BnN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature