octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: textscan


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: textscan
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:47:43 -0400

On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Philip Nienhuis wrote:

> Philip Nienhuis wrote:
>> <follow-up cc'd to octave-maintainers ML>
>> 
>> Graf, Alexander wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > you recently posted a patch to make textscan faster.
> <snip>
>> > However, I think that in line 168 (of the readily patched
>> > file<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/download.php?file_id=25423>)
>> >
>> > fskipl (fid, varargin{headerlines + 1});
>> >
>> > varargin should be replaced by args. At least that was necessary
>> > to run it with my script, where some parameters unknown to
>> > octave-textscan might have caused empty entries in varargin that
>> > are cleared out in args.
>> 
>> Hmmm, I think you are right. Good catch!
>> As my patch has already been pushed, I'll (try to) prepare a changeset
>> this weekend.
> 
> Changeset attached.
> 
> I also adapted a copyright string in strread.m (was a bit overdue)
> 
> Could one of the core devs please check if it is OK and then push it, please?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Philip
> <textscan_strread.patch>

Minor detail, but is the summary correct ?

        "Correct assignment to wrong variable f headerlines processing"

Should the "f" be "for" ?

Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]