octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package]


From: Colin Macdonald
Subject: Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package]
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:15:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 29/04/15 18:35, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
Colin (symbolic package author) can explain best why there's a need for
the overhauled heaviside.m and dirac.m to not live in symbolic; his
original aim was to get them in core. In fact he did in his OP in
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?8644  I'm not sure if .m
functions in an OF package can be called with a handle (Colin's motive
AFAIU); .oct functions in an OF package can.

Perhaps I should try to clarify this point:

0.  Forget about the OF Symbolic pkg.  :-)

1.  I maintain some code generation stuff in SymPy
    that generates Octave .m file code.  I.e., to do
    scientific computing with one's CAS output.

2.  That code needs to map heaviside and dirac into
    Octave code.

So my feeling was its an "Octave code generator" not an "Octave + Symbolic pkg code generator". I guess I also feel its not an "Octave + Specfun pkg code generator" either.

But this is all pretty minor stuff to me---especially since I already merged the support in SymPy---as long as its somewhere and *maintained* (which IMHO is Carnë's motivation too).

Colin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]