Re: [Om-synth] using om live

[Atte André Jensen]

Dave Robillard wrote:

> If you want to "replace" a patch, the inputs and outputs would have to
> be exactly the same.  What are the chances of that?

One could make sure of that...

Another way to go was autoconnect to some input/output...

> Yes, some kind of "program change" like support is needed.  My goal has
> always been for Om to be a realtime system, above all else, so now I
> need to start building in those handy features to make it a useful
> performance instrument.
>
> The question is:  how?

Exactly, let's keep thinking/talking about it, and maybe others can join 
in...

The way ams works is not ideal IMHO. It let's you store snapshots of 
controllable parameters and program change betwen them. But it's still 
the same modules and the same wireing...

I recently learned about LASH:

http://lash-audio-session-handler.org/

I'm not sure how it works, and if it could be used to solve (part of) 
the problem in question. But it's objective is promissing indeed...

> Om isn't just one instrument, it's an environment in which many
> instruments (or whatever) can exist at the same time.  That makes things
> a bit more complicated. :/

Sure, but maybe that could be turned into an advantage...

--
  .''`.  Peace, love & harmony
 : :' :  Atte
 `. `'
   `-    http://www.atte.dk