[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-user] Clarification on Open EXR and Photoshop
From: |
faisal |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-user] Clarification on Open EXR and Photoshop |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 03:27:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
why do you think you have to convert to Linux to use Cinepaint?
Cinepaint is available on Mac OS X and Windows as well.
Quoting JK <address@hidden>:
> Hello,
>
> I prefer to use Photoshop for adding special effects, and would like to film
> out using OpenEXR. (I am only adding effects to portions of the frame.)
> Question: Since Photoshop is a LDR editor (8 bits only) what will happen to
> the added effects when I convert back to OpenEXR in the 10bit floating
> format? Will they look flat, pixelated, jagged?
>
> I ask this question since there isn't a consensus on these lists on using the
> Photoshop plug-in for scanned film material. It seems Cinepaint is the top
> choice. (Converting to Linux isn't an option at this time for users such as
> myself, and After Effects doesn't have the image editing tools I need at this
> time if I wanted to go the Cineon route)
>
> Any suggestions? Remember, the key issue is quality, and if the
> Photoshop/OpenEXR combination can retain the quality, this is the first
> preference, but any other recommendations are welcome.
>
> Thank you,
>
> JK
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-user
>