[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-devel] ATTN CVS users: branching for 0.12 maintenance
From: |
Christophe Lambin |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-devel] ATTN CVS users: branching for 0.12 maintenance |
Date: |
20 Jun 2002 23:42:48 +0200 |
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 23:13, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> > So pan-0-11-fix is 0.11.3 plus some random bits from 0.11.9x.
> > I don't know if it has a consistent UI, nor if it's as stable as
> > 0.11.3.
>
> OK. Well, the ones from 0-11-fix look quite OK.
If we'd maintain 0-11-fix along with HEAD and 0-12-fix, we'd have more
branches than developers. Common sense tells me that's not a good plan.
:)
(one could argue that with just HEAD and 0-12-fix we already have more
branches than _active_ developers, but that's a different story)
Seriously, maintaining branches is a huge timesink. Let's declare
0-11-fix dead and move on.
> > I'm chalking it up as a lesson learned: I'm only committing fixes
> > to 0-12-fix, so 0.12.x == 0.12.[x-1] + fixes. That way we should be
> > able to do 0.12.x and 0.12.9x releases in parallel without too much pain.
>
> You mean only real bug fixes for stability for 0-12-fix? That's at least what
> I would like to see. New idas go in the main branch.
Well, bug fixes and (very) minor new features. You can find the planned
changes for 0.12.1 at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=Pan&target_milestone=0.12.1 and
for later 0.12.x releases at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=Pan&target_milestone=0.12.X
If anyone seems anything he'd like to work on, feel free to dig in.
Regards,
Christophe
Re: [Pan-devel] ATTN CVS users: branching for 0.12 maintenance, Jeffrey Stedfast, 2002/06/19
Re: [Pan-devel] ATTN CVS users: branching for 0.12 maintenance, Bas Mevissen, 2002/06/20