pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] Re: [0.95] Reproducible segfault when sorting on article nam


From: walt
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: [0.95] Reproducible segfault when sorting on article name
Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 11:52:24 -0700
User-agent: Mail/News 3.0a1 (X11/20060506)

Charles Kerr wrote:
>> When I click on the subject bar at the top of the header pane
>> (to sort on the subject name) I get a reproducible segfault:
> 
> The attached patch should fix the crash aspect of this...

I see that 0.96 already has this patch, and it's behavior
is slightly different but no better, alas:

(pan:20105): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_casefold: assertion `str != NULL'
failed

(pan:20105): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate_key: assertion `str !=
NULL' failed
<hundreds of pairs of lines identical to the above snipped>

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1223493952 (LWP 20105)]
0xb76e8556 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb76e8556 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0xb7708377 in vasprintf () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0xb7dc4627 in g_vasprintf () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#3  0xb7db8fef in g_string_up () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4  0xb7db907f in g_string_append_printf () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5  0xb7da8758 in g_log_default_handler () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6  0xb7da7bfa in g_logv () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7  0xb7da7d86 in g_log () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8  0xb7da7dec in g_return_if_fail_warning () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9  0xb7dbf230 in g_utf8_casefold () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 0x080ba172 in (anonymous namespace)::do_collate (address@hidden)
at header-pane.cc:81
#11 0x080ba33c in (anonymous namespace)::get_collated_subject
(model=0x8b29648, iter=0x881bca8)
    at string-view.h:147
#12 0x080ba393 in (anonymous namespace)::get_collated_subject
(model=0x8b29648, iter=0x881bca8)
    at header-pane.cc:112
<thousands of lines identical to #12 snipped>

I'm guessing that those GLib-CRITICAL messages appear once for
each article in the group now, instead of just once, before the
segfault.  The backtrace is much different this time, so I'm
hoping it will be more helpful.

BTW, I emailed you the file at your rebelbase.com address.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]