Re: [pdf-devel] Compiling for windows

[jemarch]

   >    One limitation is that due to the fact that no fork is done when
   >    running the tests, there is no way to recover from a segfault in
   >    the test (Check handles this situation correctly and sets the test
   >    as 'Error').
   > 
   > Well, that limitation is quite reasonable. We _dont_ want to write a
   > check replacement for windows :)

   AFAIK, Check developers are in fact really interested in a full-featured 
   windows port. They might have one someday.

Then I guess we will have to keep an eye in the check development :)

   > As I noted before I would prefer to simply include <check.h> and do
   > the trick with the preprocessor options. I dont like unit tests to
   > have a dependency in a specific driver (such as runtests.[ch]).

   Ok.

   I will make all these changes and send you the diff again for
   review.

Many thanks.

--
Jose E. Marchesi  <address@hidden>
                  <address@hidden>

GNU Spain         http://es.gnu.org
GNU Project       http://www.gnu.org