[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence
From: |
jemarch |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:41:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> (BTW, poppler is GPL too -- but sadly "v2 only", which is one of the
> reasons of GNU PDF's inception.)
I'm not aware of any part of poppler that is not "GPL version 2 or later".
Can
you point to a "v2 only" part that is actually linked into the library?
AFAIK, all the code from xpdf is licensed under the GPL, version 2
only.
I see that the poppler guys are licensing their changes with GPLv2 or
any later version. That is very good.
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, (continued)
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Vincent Torri, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Martin Schröder, 2009/01/09
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Brad Hards, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence,
jemarch <=
- [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Yavor Doganov, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, Ralph Giles, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] Re: about the licence, jemarch, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/01/09
- Re: [pdf-devel] about the licence, Vincent Torri, 2009/01/09