[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Ideas for phpgw / RFC
From: |
Maât |
Subject: |
Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Ideas for phpgw / RFC |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:11:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
Le 27/01/2010 15:15, Benoit Hamet a écrit :
> Hi Maat,
>
> Maât a écrit :
>
>> But i have a problem with CreateObject : It breaks code analysis and
>> object tracking tools :-(
>>
>> And that is very harmful when it comes to debugging and reverse
>> engineering with graphic IDE such as EclipsePDT or Zend Studio or Komodo :-(
>>
>> I'd rather see it replaced by something relying on new and constructors
>> with something like a "fully qualified phpgw objects names" system
>>
> Well, I agree with you, we should deprecate CreateObject in favor of
> autoload + new. Or I'm not clear ? :).
>
We share the same point ov view it seems :)
>
>>
>>> Next. If you want to merge code from a branch or another, can I suggest
>>> the use of svnmerge scripts ? This will help us for merging back things
>>> instead of looking in the history for already done merges, etc ... I'm
>>> open to suggestion regarding other tools to manage the merge stuff.
>>>
>>> Happy Hacking,
>>>
>>> Caeies
>>>
>>>
>> Eclipse PDT offers really cool merge/comparison features
>>
> That's not the point ... the point is keeping track of merges, so if
> another dev want to do some of them, he is able to do it, without the
> need to use the exact same tool, with your history :).
>
> Regards,
>
> Caeies.
>
yes of course one should be able to use the tool he likes :)
either eclipse or svnmerge or whatever merge tool involved people will
choose indeed :)
i did not think otherwise
Bests,
Maât