[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pika-dev] Re: so... string work
From: |
Jose A Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
[Pika-dev] Re: so... string work |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:20:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:58:49PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > tom: iirc, you mentioned something about
> > splitting the job? in that case, just tell me what part you're leaving
> > to me... btw, right now i'm quite busy reading emails: your string
> > document has raised quite a few reactions over there! :)
>
> Basically, I'm trying to let you get your pick of the litter. You
> can tell me what you'd rather have someone else do or where it would
> be helpful to have someone else working in parallel. My time is
> annoyingly split between Pika and arch so I wind up being the
> bottleneck if I'm not careful.
>
ok. so i'll start working on hackerlab and the hairy macros, and keep
you informed about the progress. i think this string thing will be an
excellent way of finally getting into pika (and hackerlab) innards; in
the future, i'll surely be interested in more scheme-centered work, but
right now, as a scheme beginner, i'm surely more useful as a c
developer. so... string work!
jao
- [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/22
- [Pika-dev] Re: so... string work, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2004/01/23
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/25
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/25