[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:23:25 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Matthew Dempsky <address@hidden>
> I don't feel like writing another email just to reply to the proper
> thread about this, but I just made the change so (eqv? #\U+0001
> #\ctl-a) => #t, but should it be #\ctl-A or both or should we just
> make the table lookup case insensitive so that #\ctl-a == #\ctl-A ==
> #\CTL-A (and consequently #\newline == #\NEWLINE etc)?
I think that case insensitive is the only reasonable alternative
there.
#\NEWLINE == #\newline is required by R5RS, afaict.
and "ctl-a" is a character name, just like "newline".
-t
- [Pika-dev] Re: so... string work, (continued)
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/25
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/01/25
- Re: [Pika-dev] so... string work, Tom Lord, 2004/01/25