[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Debian packaging effort
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: New Debian packaging effort |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 06:50:37 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
[trying again without quoting 900 kB]
The packaging looks pretty good to me. I added some comments in
review. I'll sponsor you, if you will fix the (fairly small)
issues that I pointed out.
Thanks,
Ben.
bojo42 <address@hidden> writes:
> I've just uploaded the revamped package to mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/pspp
>
> Feedback or sponsoring highly welcome :)
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2012, 23:11 +0100 schrieb bojo42:
>> Thanks, the testsuite is now quite pleased beside the 64bit one.
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2012, 20:30 +0000 schrieb John Darrington:
>> > I pushed a change to master which should fix this FAILED item.
>> >
>> > The first skipped on seems to be deliberately skipped on 64bit
>> > systems.
>> >
>> > For the other two items, you will need to have installed
>> > libtext-diff-perl and postgresql
>> >
>> > J'
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:18:13PM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
>> > I just tried to build for Ubuntu 10.04 (lucid) and the upcoming 12.04
>> > (precise). As precise is quite close to sid it got the same errors,
>> > but
>> > the testsuite is sucessful for the lucid build. So the reason for
>> > failure seems to be somewhere in the newer toolchain and dependencies.
>> > Maybe this helps a bit further.
>> >
>> > Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2012, 13:17 +0100 schrieb bojo42:
>> > > Okay i fixed my pbuilder setup and now i can deliver anything from
>> > the
>> > > build chroot before it's deleted, see attachment.
>> > >
>> > > @John: You guessed right i missed to depend on perl (also on
>> > libpq), but
>> > > having it added now doesn't help with the errors. Debian's perl is
>> > at
>> > > 5.14.2.
>> > >
>> > > Am Mittwoch, den 11.01.2012, 10:27 -0800 schrieb Ben Pfaff:
>> > > > bojo42 <address@hidden> writes:
>> > > >
>> > > > > - What still prevents compilation are some testsuite strikes:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 20: numeric format output FAILED (data-out.at:47)
>> > > > > 97: too many value labels skipped (sys-file-reader.at:2766)
>> > > > > 183: GET DATA /TYPE=PSQL skipped (get-data-psql.at:124)
>> > > > > 914: Perl Pspp.t skipped (perl-module.at:706)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Could really use some help for the FAILED one. Do you really
>> > need the
>> > > > > "testsuite.log" as it's quite tricky to get it out of my
>> > pbuilder setup.
>> > > >
>> > > > I don't know how to debug a test failure without testsuite.log.
>> > > >
>> > > > You can always add "cat testsuite.log" somewhere in your build
>> > > > process to ensure that testsuite.log shows up in the build log.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/10
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, Ben Pfaff, 2012/01/10
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/11
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, John Darrington, 2012/01/11
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, Ben Pfaff, 2012/01/11
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/12
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/12
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, John Darrington, 2012/01/12
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/12
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/15
- Re: New Debian packaging effort,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, John Darrington, 2012/01/17
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/17
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, Ben Pfaff, 2012/01/17
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, Ben Pfaff, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, John Darrington, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, John Darrington, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/18
- Re: New Debian packaging effort, bojo42, 2012/01/18