|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] Add -kvm option |
Date: | Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:05:27 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 |
On 10/08/2009 04:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:That's a bug in the userspace pit :) I'm worried about things like 'info pit' needing dual implementations.You mean info qdm? It'll Just Work.
I mean (qemu) info pit pit: counter 0x1234 period 0x3453 or something.
Interesting idea. I think it'll be hairy even with a point-to-point net abstraction, but it's worth trying.Could be interesting trying to tie the e1000 to vhost-net performance wise...
I don't think there's much chance of that - e1000 places important registers (like interrupt disable) in BARs whereas virtio puts them in the ring.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |